Search for: "Taylor's Administrator v. Taylor"
Results 321 - 340
of 902
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2019, 9:11 am
Citing the Supreme Court’s 1940 decision in Federal Housing Administration v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:52 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
In Taylor v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 5:37 am
The administration, after all, has failed to provide any credible evidence of any real “emergency” at the U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 7:36 am
Matthew Kahn shared the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:22 am
Circuit’s latest ruling in the case, which lifted a preliminary injunction against the administration’s ban. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:17 am
Jen Patja Howell shared the speech on the Lawfare Podcast: Margaret Taylor argued that the administration’s decision to lift the Treasury Department’s sanctions on Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska highlights the role Congress should play in decisions related to foreign affairs. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 7:00 am
After a hearing, an Administrative Law Judge found that DOT's action constituted a violation of the Taylor Law. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 7:00 am
After a hearing, an Administrative Law Judge found that DOT's action constituted a violation of the Taylor Law. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
Surveillance PI comments on Taylor Swift’s alleged use of facial recognition software at a kiosk in a recent concert, which scanned users face’s without consent and compared them to those documented to pose a security risk to her. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:08 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
Palestine Liberation Organization and Livnat v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:15 am
A year later, Administrator Michael Taylor announces that FSIS considers “raw ground beef that is contaminated with E. coli O157:H7 to be adulterated”under the FMIA. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm
(mem. op.); also see Foster v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s 2013 Shelby County v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 9:14 am
But 28 years ago in Taylor v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
In the 2005 case of Avery v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
An administrative law judge had recommended a penalty of suspension without pay for 60 days. [read post]
