Search for: "Teague v. Teague"
Results 321 - 323
of 323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2006, 12:46 pm
R. 2.Davis v. [read post]
11 Sep 2006, 12:17 pm
If a new rule is procedural, then Teague rears its ugly head. [read post]
21 Jun 2005, 6:27 pm
Honestly, it's hard to see how Booker announced any "new right" at all (although many circuits have more or less said it did, for purposes of analyzing retroactivity under Teague v Lane, a related but not necessarily identical question, even in the cockamamie sense that the expression "new rule" is used for Teague v Lane purposes); what was *new* in Booker was the *remedy* not the "right" or the "rule," IMHO. [read post]
