Search for: "Texas v. EEOC" Results 321 - 340 of 393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2022, 9:05 pm by Claire Hill
The EEOC issued the guidance after the Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
 Pix Credit hereESG, has been driven by the private sector and intensely debated in the context of privately ordered responsible business conduct standards, and formed part of a rich debates among market actors and public international organizations about the role and nature of so-called non-financial siclosure in genmeral, and sustainability and climate related factors in decision making. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:22 am by John Elwood
Texas, 18-9674 Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 5:45 am by Jon Hyman
For more information on this case, I recommend the following summaries and opinions of my fellow bloggers: Unanimous US Supreme Court: Constitutional Right to Informational Privacy Not Violated by NASA Background Check – from Workplace Prof Blog SCOTUS: NASA background check is constitutional – from Ross Runkel’s LawMemo Employment Law Blog Supreme Court: Background Investigations on Federal Contract Employees OK – from Human Resources News … [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 12:40 pm by sydniemery
Gonzalez’s book Employment Discrimination: A Context and Practice Casebook is cited in the following article: Kelly Kagan, Expansion of Joint Employer Liability Theory on the Horizon: The Ninth Circuit Adopts The Agency Test in EEOC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
EEOC, which was decided along with Bostock.] [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 4:01 am
  The availability of incentives to those with high BMI is subject to limitations including situations when it is "unreasonably difficult" or "medically inadvisable" for a participant to attempt to achieve the BMI standard.Employment Discrimination Under the rationale in EEOC v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 10:51 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Despite ACA’ amendments to HIPAA’s bona fide wellness program rules and the 11th Circuit’s rejection of an EEOC challenge in Broward County v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 7:34 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
One of the more infamous examples of the legal risks faced by companies who use staffing agency employees is Vizcaino v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme Court’s March 1, 2016 ruling in… [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am by John Elwood
Texas, 18-9674 Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]