Search for: "Texas v. Rodriguez"
Results 321 - 340
of 344
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2008, 7:20 pm
Rodriguez. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Cruz-Rodriguez, No. 052492, 052493 Convictions and sentences of twenty-six defendants for crimes arising from their involvement in a large drug distribution network that operated in a Puerto Rico housing project are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence was insufficient; 2) the evidence failed to implicate one defendant in any conspiracy; 3) the evidence implicated a defendant in a conspiracy different from the one charged; and 4) district court committed a host of errors,… [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 9:01 am
"Butch" Bradt, of Houston, found this title contribution in the case of Rodriguez v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 4:57 pm
Rodriguez, 76 Cal.Rptr.3d 1 (Cal. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 3:24 am
However, few teams will change in strength too much from last year.College FootballGame MatchupsAugust 23 to September 1,2008 (visitor v. home)Game below played on August 30 unless otherwise stated. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:19 am
See Elektra v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 9:35 am
Rodriguez, Jr., No. 07-0422 (Tex. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:09 am
Rodriguez (06-1646). [read post]
16 May 2008, 9:31 am
City of Dallas v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 9:31 am
City of Dallas v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 9:24 am
Since then, the Nevada stay has remained in effect.The lethal injection index, with full coverage of Baze v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 1:29 pm
Our usual batch of news today is complemented by another few posts detailing the outcome of Miller v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:36 am
Rodriguez, No. 07‑0422. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 7:14 am
Kerr says that Weinstein's ruling---insofar as it anticipates that the Supreme Court would overrule an old decision based on the rationales of newer cases---violates the rule laid down by the Supreme Court in Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 10:27 am
It is not clear any of the key events occurred in Texas. 3) Failure to State a Claim: McNamee argues that Clemens' complaint is factually insufficient, by failing to allege with specific detail the defamatory statements--when the statements where made, when, to whom--and cites, of course, Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 10:39 pm
An exception was O'Connor's opinion for the Court in Grutter v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 9:49 pm
US v. [read post]
