Search for: "The Examiner"
Results 321 - 340
of 161,404
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2012, 6:07 am
For those applicants or practitioners concerned about whether Track I applications will be treated differently from others in terms of grant/denial rate, our examiners are being given exactly the same training, credits and incentives to accurately examine Track I cases as for all other cases, and no training, credits or incentives are being given to bias examiner decisions in any way. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 7:42 am
Looking at cross examination as a communication and persuasion contest involving the lawyer, the witness, and the trier of fact, this logical, clearly presented book explains how effective cross examination skills can advance your cause while also weakening the position taken by the opposing side. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 5:25 am
Patent and Trademark Office recently announced that it is seeking public input on whether to adopt a process that will defer examination of patent applications until the applicant submits an express request for examination. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 10:48 am
Louis asked a lower court Friday to again examine a request on behalf of Nooner for the mental examination. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 2:56 pm
Cotton (at left), a member of the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, suggest that a sequenced approach to patent examination, in which applications are first examined for compliance with 35 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 6:41 pm
The post NCSBN Raises Passing Standard for NCLEX-PN Examination appeared first on Elizabeth B. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 6:19 am
The graph below shows examiner experience as grouped by technology center as of the end of FY2009. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:28 am
Reg. 78566) extending the prioritized examination (Track I) provisions to patent applications in which a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) has been filed (see, Three Track Patent Examinations: USPTO Provides Further Guidance). [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 5:21 am
The proposed changes include: allowing examiners more time to spend on a first action on the merits, along with more time overall to spend on a patent application; encouraging, and adding time for, examiner-initiated interviews reducing examiner credit for cases on which a request for continued examination (RCE) is filed. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
In 2018, the CFPB discontinued checking for MLA compliance during supervisory examinations on the grounds that Congress had not authorized such examination authority under the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 8:39 pm
"According to some practitioners, this is a good strategy to force the Examiner to provide a reference, because Examiners don't want to be bothered with an affidavit. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:40 pm
The new regime will provide for an accelerated examination track, a standard (status quo) track, and a delayed examination track. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 7:57 am
Adding to this site’s archived posts relating to examinations for discovery under the BC Supreme Court Rules, reasons for judgement were released this week addressing whether a party may self-record an examination for discovery. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:48 am
The defendant is entitled to continue its examination for discovery on the new matters, but is not entitled to examine on matters covered on the first day of examination for discovery. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 5:28 am
The Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works will hold a hearing on March 20, 2024, on “Examining PFAS as Hazardous Substances. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 5:28 am
The Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works will hold a hearing on March 20, 2024, on “Examining PFAS as Hazardous Substances. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 4:38 am
"They put pressure on you shamelessly," Pat Wertheim, a longtime fingerprint examiner, said. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:08 am
Two useful, albeit unreported, cases were recently provided to me dealing with objections to two fairly common examination for discovery questions and dealing with their propriety. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 12:14 pm
What happens if the expert is not cross-examined? [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:50 pm
An Experimental Examination of the Exclusionary Rule on SSRN. [read post]
