Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Bruce"
Results 321 - 340
of 848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2012, 9:16 pm
v=AWJJnQybZlk [Hat tip to Michael Mills of Neota Logic for reminding me of Asimov's Three Laws.] [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 4:56 am
Michael Knapp brought us news of the Second Circuit’s grant of an en banc rehearing in United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2015, 5:15 am
Jack also considered the Vesting Clause, which “confers all traditionally executive foreign relations powers not specifically allocated elsewhere,” as it appears throughout the Zivotofsky v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:16 am
When you know that the character seems to be a Kung Fu expert, the pun based on the film legend Bruce Lee's name becomes clearer.The case being heard was Beverley Isaacs v Edward Bignell and Naughty Tortoise Ltd. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 11:00 am
(Click here for more on northern spotted v. barred.) [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 2:13 pm
Note to our Right on Crime friends: We need to see Bernie Kerik v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:04 pm
But worse, it cuts right to the core of fundamental computing freedom questions and cues up the next legislative battle to address what software people are allowed to run on their devices. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:38 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Elhady v. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 1:23 pm
Jolynn Dellinger and Stephanie Pell argued that if Roe v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
Likewise, although Graham announced that the subpoenas are necessary because "[t]he American people deserve answers to these questions" about "why all these counterintelligence investigations were opened to begin with" and "how these investigations got off the rails," a recent Office of Legal Counsel opinion insists that "transmitting information “to inform the public . . . is not a part of the legislative function. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:33 pm
In that regard, the closest case I know (and immediately brought up when I commented on the FTC's complaint) is Pistacchio v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 11:00 am
Their lawsuit, Salim v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 5:13 am
Kennedy v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 3:59 am
Consider Justice Kennedy's majority opinion in Sykes v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 4:33 am
” In Gilley v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
The rule of three was held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911.In applying the Rule of Three, tie scores can allow the appointing authority to make its selection from among far more than three eligibles. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:56 pm
The example provided is People v Doe, 2011 IL 102345, ¶15. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
The petitioners have pulled together an experienced legal team, including Lord Anthony Gifford, counsel to the landmark case of Dudgeon v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 3:43 pm
You can find these opinions by searching for cases (like Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
