Search for: "The United States Court of Federal Claims" Results 321 - 340 of 37,633
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2009, 3:30 am
United States [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that a defendant's claim that the prosecution breached a plea agreement must be raised at trial in order to be reviewable on appeal, according to the plain-error standard under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure [Rule [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 6:48 am by Liskow & Lewis
  Here, the court found that the United States acquired its interest pursuant to a federal regulatory program. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 1:30 pm by WIMS
In an split, en banc decision, the Appeals Court explains that Greg Herden, Roger Herden, and Garrett Herden (the Herdens) sued the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:27 am by Amy Howe
  Petitioners next invoke what they describe as “the general rule of nonparty preclusion . . . grounded in the United States Constitution” and its due process requirements. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 9:15 am by Epstein Becker Green
Fullerton III On January 26, 2015, in an issue of first impression at the appellate level, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that a federal catch-all four year statute of limitations applies to whistleblower retaliation claims filed in federal court under Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), rather than a two-year statute of limitations applicable to cases alleging fraud under the securities laws. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 4:15 am by IPWatchdog
On August 28, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed the U.S. [read post]
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (the “Eleventh Circuit”) found that there was no distinction between the actions brought before a federal court asserting jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), and the actions brought in the state court asserting federal jurisdiction under CAFA. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 10:40 am by Mashel Law, L.L.C.
  This was followed by her appointment in 2012 as a sitting judge to the United District Court for the District of Columbia and then in 2021 to a seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 8:50 am
Both Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution and Federal law authorize Federal courts to hear admiralty claims. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 8:50 am
Both Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution and Federal law authorize Federal courts to hear admiralty claims. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:39 pm by Gregory Forman
Turner’s claim was based on the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and since the United States Supreme Court is always entitled to review state court decisions that rely upon federal constitutional principles, it is unclear why the United States Supreme Court thinks it might not have jurisdiction. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:39 am by Broussard & David
  An SF95 is used to present claims against the United States under the Federal Torts Claims Act (FTCA) for injury to self or property allegedly caused by a federal employee’s wrongful act or omission, so long as that act occurred within the scope of the employee’s federal employment. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:39 am by Broussard & David
  An SF95 is used to present claims against the United States under the Federal Torts Claims Act (FTCA) for injury to self or property allegedly caused by a federal employee’s wrongful act or omission, so long as that act occurred within the scope of the employee’s federal employment. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:55 am by Dan Stein
The Supreme Court has decided to review certain elements in United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 1:35 pm by Barhoma Law
Last month, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in an inmate’s claim that the conditions in which he was housed violated his Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. [read post]
Additionally, the complaint claims that gun manufacturers recklessly distribute their products to distributors and dealers throughout the United States. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
The Judiciary Act of 1789 provided for cases to enter a federal court through an original filing, through removal of a case originally filed in state court, and through an appeal from the highest court of a state to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]