Search for: "Thomas v. No Named Defendants" Results 321 - 340 of 1,958
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2018, 6:26 am by Evan Lee
When a federal district court sentences a defendant under an incorrect Sentencing Guidelines range, the defendant ordinarily is entitled to a resentencing, the Supreme Court ruled 7-2 on Monday in Rosales-Mireles v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:08 pm by Edward A. Fallone
  Justice Thomas concurred with the plurality opinion, but would have gone further and overruled the 1976 decision in Buckley v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
(Peter Thomas Lane, Schlanger & Schlanger LLP, Pleasantville, N.Y.; Owen Randolph Bragg, Horwitz, Horwitz & Associates, Chicago, IL, on the brief), for Saliha Madden.Thomas Arthur Leghorn (Joseph L. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:35 pm by John Jascob
In dissent, Justice Thomas argued that disgorgement is not a traditional equitable remedy and can never be awarded under Section 21(d)(5) (Liu v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am by Jeremy Gordon
The 14 named survivor plaintiffs were Hungarian nationals or resided in Hungary-annexed countries prior to the war; all became citizens of the United States, Canada, Israel or Australia following the war. [read post]