Search for: "U. S. Federal Government"
Results 321 - 340
of 4,986
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Starting with the Court’s 2022 Term, PDFs of the U. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:04 pm
When that presumption is present, the government bears the burden of proving you’re not at risk. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 3:58 am
Although that case dealt with whether a state could challenge the federal government’s ability to exercise prosecutorial discretion, it can also potentially deter a state’s ability to demonstrate standing when it challenges other federal immigration policies. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 12:40 pm
Biden, a federal judge issued a ruling that enjoins certain U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 8:33 am
Un patient ayant reçu un appel de ce consultant dénonce la situation. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:56 am
Alabama Assn., 594 U. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
Strict scrutiny requires the government to show that the speech restriction is "narrowly tailored to address the State's compelling governmental interests. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
This blogpost discusses the Eleventh Circuit’s opinion and argues that the result is deeply disturbing. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm
S., at ___ (slip op., at 24) (quoting MCI, 512 U. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:59 am
In their attempts to suppress alleged disinformation, the Federal Government, and particularly the Defendants named here, are alleged to have blatantly ignored the First Amendment's right to free speech. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:26 pm
Kurtzman, 403 U. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 10:49 pm
That is not surprising at the federal level, because the Federal Government did not prohibit threats until the early 20th century. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 10:36 am
Richard D., 410 U. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:45 am
S. 387, 396 (2012) (“Federal officials, as an initial matter, must decide whether it makes sense to pursue removal at all”). [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:50 pm
S. 387, 396 (2012) (“Federal officials, as an initial matter, must decide whether it makes sense to pursue removal at all”). [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 12:37 pm
For example, in the loan forgiveness case, the Biden Administration relies on a vague provision of the HEROES Act that allows the executive branch to "waive or modify" regulations governing federal student loans to justify cancellation of over $400 billion in student loan debt. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
Under Colorado's logic, the government may compel anyone who speaks for pay on a given topic to accept all commissions on that same topic—no matter the underlying message—if the topic somehow implicates a customer's statutorily protected trait. [read post]
