Search for: "U. S. v. Davis*#" Results 321 - 340 of 425
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 14 May 2024 there will be an application for security for costs in the case of Sikhs for Justice and another v Ranger KB-2022-004490 and a statement in open court in the case of Davies -v- BBC–KB-2024-000828. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
The Irish Times had a piece “Irish watchdog’s case against Facebook to be heard in Europe’s highest court”. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  This is amply demonstrated by Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. v Pollack  2019 NY Slip Op 50793(U)  Decided on May 17, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County  Reed, J.. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am by John Elwood
That’s what happened in Culbertson v. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
John Darwin’s privacy complaint against the Daily Mail has been resolved, as has Linda Hall’s against the Courier. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
However there was no mention of either in the Queen’s Speech. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 3:22 am by Peter Mahler
In 3P-733, LLC v Davis, 2019 NY Slip Op 30946(U) [Sup Ct NY County Apr. 2, 2019], Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrea Masley dismissed such a claim on other grounds, namely, because the claim was duplicative of the plaintiff LLC member’s separate claim for breach of fiduciary duty. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
Giving due deference to the court’s credibility determinations it concluded that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s request for attorney’s fees. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 297 N.W.2d 252, 258 (Minn. 1980); Dadd v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has an interesting post on “medical privacy” dealing with the case of ABC v St George’s Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (2017) EWCA Civ 336 which concludes that clinicians treating a patient with Huntingdon’s disease have an arguable duty to disclose the diagnosis to the patient’s daughters. [read post]