Search for: "U. S. v. Holder"
Results 321 - 340
of 561
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2017, 3:22 am
These observations are spurred by a recent court decision in Pokoik v Norsel Realties, 2017 NY Slip Op 50459(U) [Sup Ct NY County Apr. 12, 2017], in which Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Jeffrey K. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:28 am
The Court of Appeals began its analysis of Janisch’s argument by noting, first, that she “[u]ndoubtedly, obtained data. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 5:35 pm
’” Of course, hanging over Orchid’s counterclaim was the Federal Circuit’s 2010 decision in Novo Nordisk A/S v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 3:32 am
A member might also take guidance from the First Department’s decision in Lemle v Lemle, 92 AD3d 494, 497 [1st Dept 2012]. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:12 am
Still speaking hypothetically, if the image was published on the website of Scotland Yard, then "[u]nless [would be] specifically stated that particular material is available for general use then it should not be copied or re-used without the explicit permission of the Metropolitan Police Service or of other copyright holders where material is used under licence. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 7:21 am
Circuit’s opinion in Latif v. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 7:09 am
Continental v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 10:15 am
Such differences in approach can be seen in the litigation between Italian GI “Gorgonzola” and a German cheese “Cambozola” in the 1990's.The conflict was litigated separately in Germany (6 U 71/96), Austria (4Ob25/01g), and Denmark (V-112-04). [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:44 pm
S. [read post]
23 May 2014, 6:08 pm
Category: Claim Construction By: John Kirkpatrick, Contributor TitleShire Development, LLC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
U-Haul Co. of West Virginia v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
S. 47, 58 (2007) (citing Beck v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 11:59 am
Ultimately, however, the court relied on dicta from the U/S/ Supreme Court in Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 12:12 pm
U. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:24 am
Although we agree that “the Government’s interest in combating terrorism is an urgent objective of the highest order,” Holder v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:36 am
” Id. at 271.The Court’s statement in Verdugo was an elaboration of its earlier language in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 5:37 am
Bolden, 446 U. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
This post assesses the Solicitor General’s argument, in New York v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 10:01 pm
I use the recent United States Supreme Court case Kelo v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
A licensed public insurance adjuster is expressly prohibited from participating directly or indirectly in the reconstruction, repair, or restoration of damaged property that is the subject of a claim adjusted by the license holder; acting as a public insurance adjuster and a contractor on the same claim is a statutorily-defined conflict of interest. [read post]
