Search for: "U. S. v. May" Results 321 - 340 of 7,455
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2023, 7:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
  What may happen later is anyone’s guess and I recommend that you read the entire opinion for the entirety of the Court’s reasoning. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:03 am by Peter Mahler
Court Denies Equitable Contribution Claim Against Former Partners Esterson v Spring, 2023 NY Slip Op 32219(U) [Sup Ct NY County June 30, 2023]. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm by Howard Knopf
Ariel and I, along with a very smart young law professor named David Lametti, who later became Minister of Justice, made the prevailing arguments in the SCC in the 2015 case of Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Jordan Steinberg
While some companies have made the argument successfully that they had no knowledge of a partner’s intentions to transport their goods to New York (Ortiz v Food Mach. of Am., Inc.) (2014 NY Slip Op. 31868[U] [Bronx Ct. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Thacker v Constantine Cannon, LLP 2023 NY Slip Op 32376(U) July 14, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155930/2018Judge: James d’Auguste it is too early for the court to decide who did what. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court's decision rejecting Petitioner's motion "to reargue and review" is set out below: 2023 NY Slip Op 32352(U) Docket Number: Index No. 156145/2022 This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court's decision rejecting Petitioner's motion "to reargue and review" is set out below: 2023 NY Slip Op 32352(U) Docket Number: Index No. 156145/2022 This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 5:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
While MWE may have beenplaintiff’s company accountant, per the terms of the agreements, it did not agree to bean auditor or investigator. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Ronald M. Levin
Justice Kavanaugh’s policy arguments borrowed heavily from Heckler v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In a letter dated January 29, 2020, the School District's superintendent informed the petitioner that he would be recommending that the Board of Education terminate the petitioner's probationary appointment effective June 30, 2020, and that the Board of Education would vote on the recommendation at a meeting on May 12, 2020. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In a letter dated January 29, 2020, the School District's superintendent informed the petitioner that he would be recommending that the Board of Education terminate the petitioner's probationary appointment effective June 30, 2020, and that the Board of Education would vote on the recommendation at a meeting on May 12, 2020. [read post]