Search for: "U.S. v. Jane Doe" Results 321 - 340 of 500
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2014, 3:38 pm by Cicely Wilson
 He appears to have led an exemplary life in the U.S. since entering (lawfully) and applying for asylum.United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
ADMIRAL, ND Cal 2014http://t.co/Mw6TpA7yHZ -> Minor entitled to sue anonymously for internet wrongs Doe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:55 am by Ben
The Canadian media featured extensive coverage over the weekend of the federal court decision in Voltage Pictures LLC v John Doe and Jane Doe (2014 FC 161) which, whilst opening the possibility of ISPs being required to disclose the names and addresses of thousands of allegedly infringing subscribers, also establishes new safeguards against copyright trolling in Canada and balanced the interests of copyright owners against the right of privacy. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:41 pm by Margot Patterson
John Doe and Jane Doe (2014 FC 161) has already received considerable attention for its approach to deterring so-called “copyright trolls”: plaintiffs with “improper motives” who file multitudes of infringement lawsuits to extort quick settlements. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 6:02 am
  The opinion does not cite the statute(s) under which he was charged, but I assume it was 18 U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Peter W. Martin
While a majority of U.S. jurisdictions rely entirely on the NRS, the U.S. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 8:32 am by Michelle N. Meyer
I wrote previously about a pending lawsuit to be filed by the ACLU on behalf of 54-year-old Jane Doe, a U.S. citizen who alleges that she was subjected to six hours of increasingly invasive cavity searches by U.S. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 7:00 am by Nick Basciano
 Jane highlighted reports in the New York Times revealing U.S. intelligence efforts to monitor hostile communications in massively multiplayer online role-playing games (MMORPG). [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Jones filed a complaint as a Jane Doe plaintiff, and at an evidentiary hearing on August 15, 2010, she entered her true name as she filed for a default judgment against “the dirty.com. [read post]