Search for: "U.S. v. STATE OF TEXAS."
Results 321 - 340
of 8,431
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court recently granted review in Walker v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 7:01 am
The Supreme Court decided Texas v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 12:29 pm
’” The Texas Supreme Court, by extending immunity in the Hillman case, joined the U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 4:19 am
DOJ, Jan. 3, 2024 "The Justice Department today filed suit against the State of Texas to challenge Senate Bill 4 (SB 4) under the U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 2:24 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in U.S. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 8:37 am
This is the third post on equity in the United States v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 3:05 am
Harris County, Texas, Judge Caprice Cosper (right) has set August 5 as the date for execution of José Ernesto MedellÃÂn, whose bid for relief the U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 7:15 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 10:52 am
, 2012 U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:05 pm
" The Supreme Court's ruling said that while the U.S. had entered into the 1963 Vienna Convention, it is not binding on the states without a law being passed by Congress. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:24 pm
The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 2:25 am
Robinson, 383 U.S. 375 (1966); Dusky v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 1:43 pm
Texas, 443 U.S. 47 (1979). [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 1:43 pm
Texas, 443 U.S. 47 (1979). [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 12:29 pm
The U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 1:13 pm
The post Amicus Brief Explains in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 11:40 am
The military appeals case is U.S. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:22 pm
That extension — considerably less than the added thirty days the states had sought — makes it more likely that the case, United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:20 am
On federal habeas review of an Ohio state court conviction, the Sixth Circuit rejects argument that Lawrence v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 2:30 am
In February, the Texas Supreme Court heard oral arguments in CMH Homes, Inc. et al. v. [read post]