Search for: "U.S. v. State Compensation Insurance Fund" Results 321 - 340 of 483
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2012, 11:22 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
OCR Hits Alaska Medicaid For $1.7M+ For HIPAA Security Breach Model Language May Aid Section 83(b) Elections Even As Executive & Other Special Compensation Carry Growing Liability Traps IRS To Offer Help For U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:06 am by David J. DePaolo
Following this injury, Salas brought a workers' compensation claim against Sierra Chemical and its insurance carrier, State Compensation Insurance Fund. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
In response to the catastrophe, the State of Minnesota established a fund to compensate the victims and their families, ultimately paying them over $36 million. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:25 pm by Amy Howe
Florida, a challenge to a state law that prohibits state universities from using any state funds or administering any non-state funds for travel to a “terrorist state” and also prohibits public officers and employees from being reimbursed for travel to a “terrorist state. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:22 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
Court Rules That State Bar’s Professional Liability Fund Is NOT Subject to MMSEA Reporting Mark Popolizio, of the Crowe Paradis Services Corp. explains the case of Oregon State Bar Professional Liability Fund v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:49 pm
The SIF is subsidized by a surcharge imposed on employers' workers' compensation insurance premiums. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
The Defense Base Act (“DBA”) is a system of federal workers’ compensation applied to United States contractors working abroad on U.S. bases or pursuant to a U.S. contract. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
The Defense Base Act (“DBA”) is a system of federal workers’ compensation applied to United States contractors working abroad on U.S. bases or pursuant to a U.S. contract.  [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am by Marty Lederman
While most everyone’s attention understandably has been focused on the constitutional challenge to the insurance-maintenance provision of the ACA being argued in Court this morning, the other substantive challenge before the Court this week—namely, the argument by the 26 plaintiff States that Congress’s manner of expanding Medicaid eligibility in the ACA is unconstitutional (being argued tomorrow afternoon)—has mostly slipped under the radar. [read post]