Search for: "UNIVERSAL SERVICE V POST-CONFIRMATION"
Results 321 - 340
of 913
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2017, 7:48 am
And as the Supreme Court held in Correctional Services Corp. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
Drahozal, a prolific writer on arbitration, has posted several of his previous writings on SSRN. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:26 am
Norwich orders have increasingly been used in the online context by plaintiffs who allege that they are being anonymously defamed or defrauded and seek orders against Internet service providers to disclose the identity of the perpetrator (York University v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:06 pm
Ekaterina Aristova, PhD in Law Candidate, University of Cambridge authored this post on ‘Tort litigation Against Transnational Corporations: UK court will hear a case for overseas human rights abuses’. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:37 am
The Post informs us that Amano confirmed the agreement’s confidential status, saying that “confidentiality is an essential building block to protect the safeguard regime. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:37 am
The Post informs us that Amano confirmed the agreement’s confidential status, saying that “confidentiality is an essential building block to protect the safeguard regime. [read post]
17 May 2016, 7:33 am
See Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 12:51 am
– e.g. among others, to analyse brand awareness by recognising images of branded products posted on social media or online marketplaces. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:07 pm
Roy Greenslade has a blog post on the appointments. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
In February the Higher Regional Court Munich (OLG) decided that YouTube and its service cannot be called to account for any user generated copyright infringements. [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:08 am
In an op-ed in the Washington Post, E.J. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 6:38 am
Jane noted that the appellees in the Hatim v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm
On 24 June 2022, one of five grounds for permission to appeal was successful, related to the serious harm test post-publication of the Electoral Commission report that found no evidence of law breaking by Banks. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm
Pulse Trading, Inc (Docket Report) District Court W D Virginia: Intervening rights absolve of damages for activities before reexamination certificate issue date: University of Virginia Patent Foundation v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 5:59 am
At The University of Chicago Law School, Ginsburg stated on the 40th anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:52 am
It receives plenty of lip service. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 3:01 am
(Patents Post Grant Blog) US: On remand, Federal Circuit (once again) decides in favor of patent eligibility for methods of treatment and diagnostic tests: Prometheus v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 11:35 pm
This post comes to us from Matthew G. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:58 pm
The following is a guest post by Elizabeth Osborne, legal reference librarian. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
[Selim v NYC Transit Authority, 220 AD2d 515]Terminating an employee for failing to turn in his keys when ordered. [read post]
