Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 321 - 340
of 51,059
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2009, 2:19 pm
Given this fact, I don't think application of the exclusionary rule is proper. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 11:26 pm
David Law and I have been wondering why and how the Supreme Court uses legislative history to decide cases ever since Environmental Defense v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:06 am
The Supreme Court today decided Air Wisconsin v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 7:10 am
Big Ligas, LLC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 10:26 am
Riley v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:09 pm
When I first saw the caption to this case -- Capra v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:22 pm
Boies cited Romer v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 2:35 pm
After all, as Justice Holmes said in Gitlow v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 8:37 am
Customers purchasing cartridges through the Return Program are given a discount in exchange for agreeing to use each cartridge once before returning it to Lexmark. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 5:30 am
Brown and Biden v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:00 am
The Court noted: "Since the law favors the free and unobstructed use of real property, a restrictive covenant must be strictly construed against those seeking to enforce it, and may not be given an interpretation extending beyond the clear meaning of its terms (see Witter v Taggart, 78 NY2d 234, 237-238; Wechsler v Gasparrini, 40 AD3d 976; Liebowitz v Forman, 22 AD3d 530, 531; Kaufman v Fass, 302 AD2d 497, 498, cert denied 540 US 1162… [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:00 am
" The Court noted: "Since the law favors the free and unobstructed use of real property, a restrictive covenant must be strictly construed against those seeking to enforce it, and may not be given an interpretation extending beyond the clear meaning of its terms (see Witter v Taggart, 78 NY2d 234, 237-238; Wechsler v Gasparrini, 40 AD3d 976; Liebowitz v Forman, 22 AD3d 530, 531; Kaufman v Fass, 302 AD2d 497, 498, cert denied 540… [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:48 am
I read an interesting decision out of Alberta recently, Gilberds v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:31 pm
This case involves drug manufacturer “use codes,” which are patent descriptions that brand name drug manufacturers submit to the Food and Drug Administration for use in determining whether a given generic drug, if approved for marketing, will infringe a patent held by a brand name manufacturer. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 6:15 am
EFF is representing the plaintiff in this case, who has been given permission by the court to allow him to use his pseudonym Mr. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 2:33 am
Jones Jr represents a very unusual use of Judiciary Law 487. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:15 pm
But, given the importance of the topic, I will refrain from calling land use attorneys nerds...but just this once. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 10:13 am
In First Niagara Insurance Brokers, Inc. v. [read post]
