Search for: "US v. London"
Results 321 - 340
of 3,698
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2012, 4:00 am
On the facts it was clear that the notices were, in the ordinary use of language, “given” to the family members, and accepted by them. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 7:10 am
Supreme Court's controversial 2005 decision in Kelo v New London (545 US 469) greatly expanded the government's power of eminent domain by holding that the government could transfer land from one private owner to another to further economic development. [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:16 pm
TCI/US West Communications, Inc.,117 F.3d 900, 907-08 (5th Cir. 1997)). [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 2:57 pm
Regent University v Regent's University London [2013] EWPCC 39 Patents County Court, 6 September 2013, is a decision of Mr Recorder Alastair Wilson QC that has so far received little attention, possibly because it's only an interim ruling from a junior court. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 4:32 pm
And my faculty colleagues, especially Program Director Carlos Vázquez, are engaged and accessible. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
City of New London, in which the United States Supreme Court held that New London could use eminent domain to transfer land to private developers for the purpose of stimulating economic development. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:19 am
The Society of Editors Annual Conference took place in London on 18 to 20 October 2015. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 2:03 am
This update isn’t going to go into detail on defamation law but will, I hope, explain further why I think the scaremongering after Depp v Heard (US trial) was exaggerated. [read post]
11 May 2008, 4:14 am
New London. [read post]
29 May 2008, 7:56 am
In Zaman v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:59 am
For the London Free Press – November 22, 2010 Read this on Canoe Traditionally, they have been reserved for inventions that are tangible The recent Federal Court of Canada decision in Amazon.com Inc v. the Attorney General of Canada held that a “business method” can be patented in Canada. [read post]
5 May 2017, 7:51 am
Perhaps one of the most important eminent domain cases in recent years was Kelo v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:16 pm
Roe v Wade [legalizing abortion] was another ... [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:06 pm
Lilly had challenged the patent based on the fact that there is no known use of the protein. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 10:23 am
Strickley v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 5:08 am
For the London Free Press – February 14, 2011 Read this on Canoe PIPEDA: Law requires a high degree of accuracy when collecting personal information The recent Federal Court of Canada decision in Nammo v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 2:48 pm
Belated, I know, but this is the first chance I have had to really look at the judgment in Weaver (R) v London & Quadrant Housing Trust [2008] EWHC 1377 (Admin). [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 2:48 pm
Belated, I know, but this is the first chance I have had to really look at the judgment in Weaver (R) v London & Quadrant Housing Trust [2008] EWHC 1377 (Admin). [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 4:05 pm
Crown Office Chambers barrister, Sue Lindsay, was one of the counsel in the Witham case.Here is a summary of the case you can read without having to leave (just scroll down and zoom in using >>);Witham Case (UK) - Get more free documentsOr link here to the full case;[click on the title of this post to read more...] [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 11:47 am
From rainy London... [read post]
