Search for: "US v. Soares"
Results 321 - 340
of 361
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2009, 5:50 am
French '3 strikes' law now legal (Ars Technica) (IP Watch) Germany Denic softens its registration rules (IPKat) Sweden Pirate Bay founders banned from running the site (TorrentFreak) Fresh Pirate Bay purchase attempt by four potential buyers (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom ISP threatens legal action against UK over anti-piracy plans (TorrentFreak) UK to introduce three strikes policy (Michael Geist) (Electronic Frontier Foundation) United States US General Facebook for scientists… [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 10:13 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:05 am
The threshold question in Preston v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
Starting with the seminal case, Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
Starting with the seminal case, Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 7:39 am
Now that the temperature in England has soared to fresh and unexpected summer heights, the IPKat's readers have turned their thoughts once again to drink. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 9:23 pm
In Soaring Helmet Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 2:08 am
In this respect, Naz Foundation is in stark contrast to the extensive discussion of legal history in the case it cites so extensively, Lawrence v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 9:52 pm
In a recent case this month, Barnes v Yahoo! [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
(1709 Copyright Blog) Open access for University College of London research product (1709 Copyright Blog) Research by Bournemouth University and FremantleMedia ‘The exploitation of television formats: intellectual property and non-law based strategies (1709 Copyright Blog) Virgin Media, Universal Music team up to offer UK unlimited music (Intellectual Property Watch) (IP Osgoode) SCRIPT establishes IP Foresight Forum to discuss IP and media law and policy development (IPKat) United… [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 6:00 pm
McMahon (Internet Cases) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Google – Google sued again for trade mark infringement in relation to AdWords program: Soaring Helmet v Leatherup.com (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Psystar – Psystar owes Apple $75,000 while Apple moves to lift stay in dispute over unauthorised Mac clones (Ars Technica) [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:12 pm
" Marbury v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 8:16 am
By Eric Goldman Soaring Helmet Corp. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
Supreme CourtØ Public Citizen's most recent Sup Ct Watch list hereØ SCOTUSblog's most recent Petitions to Watch hereØ Ross Runkel's US Sup Ct Employment Law Cases - Pending & decided herePetition for Cert Granted:DecidedCrawford v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 12:50 pm
Courts have elaborated on these definitions by focusing on the “intended use” of the product as revealed by its marketing and labeling claims, regardless of its actual physical effect [See United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
These are the same pages from DOD's court-martial playbook used in the Camp Pendleton Eight courts-martial package. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 2:28 am
., v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 5:55 pm
While individual cities may be able to negotiate a longer lease for stadium venues, or write provisions in leases that would deter teams from leaving their cities, there is very little that fans can do to avoid paying substantial costs to see their home teams. [26] In the past, fans have tried to use lease agreements between the city and the sports team to challenge increased prices. [27] In Heidrick v. [read post]
