Search for: "US v. Watkins"
Results 321 - 340
of 433
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Stronski, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Tags: Board composition, directors, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC enforcement, Shareholder activism, universal proxy rule X Corp. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 1:01 am
Ibrahim, William & Mary Law School, on Wednesday, November 2, 2016 Tags: Capital formation, Crowdfunding, Investor protection, IPOs, JOBS Act, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation,Small firms, Tech companies ISS Proposes New 2017 Voting Policies Posted by Lyuba Goltser, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, on Wednesday, November 2, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, Charter & bylaws, Dual-class stock, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, IPOs,ISS, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting,… [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 4:19 am
By chance today I read an interesting article in the current edition of the Society for Computers & Law journal on Bilski v Kappos by Dr Robert Harrison and Jordan S Hatcher, in which they suggest that companies build defensive IP portfolios to use when faced with a challenge of patent infringement from a competitor -- to cross-license or cross-sue. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 6:36 am
Watkins 335 U.S. 160 (1948) for the proposition that “the President’s authority to detain German nationals continued for over six years after the fighting with Germany had ended. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 9:50 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Robert Chesney argued that the government's arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:21 am
That was the question before the Justices as the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 4:25 am
United Kingdom and Al-Skeini v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
On the same day, O’Callaghan J made an order for costs in the case of Watkins v Tatana [2023] FCA 248, in favour of the Respondents. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm
On 23 March 2022 Steyn J heard an application in the case of QRT -v- JBE QB-2022-000825. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 4:09 pm
Watkins, 335 U.S. 160. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 8:04 am
Watkins decision in 1961. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:02 am
Jackson, Harvard Law School, on Saturday, April 22, 2017 Tags: Accountability, Bank boards, Banks, Boards of Directors, CFPB, Compliance & ethics, Consumer protection, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Incentives, Misconduct, Oversight, Proxy advisors, Risk oversight, Shareholder voting, Wells Fargo Assessing Financial Advisor Compensation Disclosure Following Vento v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 11:55 pm
Those feelings should be shared by us alone. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 6:10 am
This decision contrasts with an Ontario Labour Relations Board (the “OLRB”) decision Watkins v The Health and Safety Association for Government Services. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:00 pm
That is a lesson that can be drawn from the recent Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench case of Watkins v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:00 pm
That is a lesson that can be drawn from the recent Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench case of Watkins v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:00 pm
That is a lesson that can be drawn from the recent Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench case of Watkins v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm
On 24 June 2021 the Court of Appeal (Popplewell, Dingemans and Carr LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Greenstein v Campaign Against Antisemitism. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:00 am
” Wrighten v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
ATTORNEY’S FEES ■Jose Parra, Applicant v. [read post]
