Search for: "USA v. August" Results 321 - 340 of 797
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2014, 9:01 am by Lyle Denniston
Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on a high-stakes legal battle between a brand-name drug company and a group of companies making generic drugs – Teva Pharmaceuticals USA v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
T-Mobile USA, Inc., No. 08-11717 (E.D. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:18 am by Don Cruse
ANDREW VERNOOY, No. 11-0731 Some older stories Here are a few of the other stories that accumulated on my desk in August: Statesman: “Texas Supreme Court accepts business-tax case” about IN RE NESTLE USA, INC., No. 12-0518 StateImpact/NPR: “Texas Supreme Court Reinforces Denbury Decision on Eminent Domain. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:57 am by SHG
The last time I read something that made me feel quite this flavor of incandescent was a decade ago, in law school — it was Scalia’s dissent in Lawrence v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 1:57 pm by Barry Herman
  However, the Federal Circuit found error with the Final Determination, in particular finding that ALJ Luckern erred in placing the burden of proving authorization on Bourdeau rather than on Deere in violation of its opinion in SKF USA, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 11:43 am
Viewed in that context, any thought a consumer might have that the words “Havana Club” indicate the geographic origin of the rum must certainly be dispelled by the plain and explicit statements of geographic origin on the label, according to the court.Survey EvidenceThe trial court properly disregarded the survey evidence as immaterial, because the Lanham Act does not forbid language that reasonable people would have to acknowledge is not false or misleading, the court concluded.The… [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:17 am by Evan M. Levow
Chun, New Jersey DWI Attorney Blog, August 30, 2010 Photo credit: By Eric Kilby from USA (YAWN, Uploaded by Snowmanradio) [CC BY-SA 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:16 pm by Florian Mueller
Undoubtedly, what was already warranted in the Garretson mop-head case is hugely more relevant in the smartphone era.There's some indication that the Supreme Court may have felt last year that the question of apportionment at least potentially warranted another look: on April 4, 2018, the Supreme Court invited the Solicitor General to express the views of the federal government on the cert petition in EVE-USA, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 5:28 am
"* August 31, 2007, "The UK Takes Steps to Curb Illegal Overdraft Fees, But US Efforts Have Not Been So Well Received. [read post]