Search for: "USA v. Real Property" Results 321 - 340 of 389
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2010, 2:05 am
 BODIES (76%); VIOLENT CRIME (76%); REAL PROPERTY LAW (76%); CRIMINAL OFFENSES ( ...NEW YORK, USA (94%)     9. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Ethicon Endo-Surgery (Property, intangible) CAFC: The presumption of irreparable harm? [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 1:04 am
NEW YORK COUNTY Real Property Equitable Lien to Proceeds Is Superior to Mechanic's Lien Arbor Realty Funding LLC v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 1:39 am
DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Intellectual Property 'Miss Asia USA' Mark Does Not Infringe, Blur 'Miss USA' Beauty Pageant Trademark Miss Universe L.P. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
- PARADIES trade mark dispute (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC finds patent covering cigarette packaging foil embossing technology valid and infringed; director and shareholder of first defendant personally liable: Boegli-Gravures SA v Darsail-ASP Ltd and Andrei Ivanovich Pyzhov (PatLit) EWHC clarifies 'link' in trade mark infringement dispute between Daimler and Sany (Managing Intellectual Property) Sue and settle - but who is the real winner? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
- PARADIES trade mark dispute (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC finds patent covering cigarette packaging foil embossing technology valid and infringed; director and shareholder of first defendant personally liable: Boegli-Gravures SA v Darsail-ASP Ltd and Andrei Ivanovich Pyzhov (PatLit) EWHC clarifies 'link' in trade mark infringement dispute between Daimler and Sany (Managing Intellectual Property) Sue and settle - but who is the real winner? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
– PARADIES trade mark dispute (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC finds patent covering cigarette packaging foil embossing technology valid and infringed; director and shareholder of first defendant personally liable: Boegli-Gravures SA v Darsail-ASP Ltd and Andrei Ivanovich Pyzhov (PatLit) EWHC clarifies ‘link’ in trade mark infringement dispute between Daimler and Sany (Managing Intellectual Property) Sue and settle – but who is the… [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
— Doug Oakley, Contra Costa Time, October 26, 2009 Homeowners in nine East Bay cities who sell or upgrade their properties starting in March must spend hundreds to thousands of dollars replacing their sewer lines under court orders obtained by the federal Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Or on life support, at least - MEI v JCM American Corp stayed pending outcome of Mars v Coin Acceptors (Property, intangible) O2 Micro - ITC judge grants in part O2's motion for summary determination of importa [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Or on life support, at least - MEI v JCM American Corp stayed pending outcome of Mars v Coin Acceptors (Property, intangible) O2 Micro - ITC judge grants in part O2's motion for summary determination of importa [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 12:00 am
For instance, in Centrafam v Sterling case [(1976) F.S.R. 164], the real beneficiary was the parallel importer who sold the drug nalidixic acid (Negram) twice the price in England, not the final consumer or the patent holder. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
Weymouth, MA; Anne Hilbert, President) Aerosoft Usa, Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
Anjani Kumar Goenka & Anr (IP Frontline) Hollywood v Bollywood v Tollywood: When is ‘plagiarism’ equal to ‘copyright infringement’? [read post]