Search for: "USA v. Vehicle"
Results 321 - 340
of 541
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. ___________________________________________________________________________ Liberty University v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:23 pm
"- Antonin Scalia, oral arguments, US v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:05 am
New Hampshire and Gonzalez v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 12:32 pm
Victor Stanley, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 6:14 am
The judge denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint in Association of Taxicab Operators USA v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 2:36 am
on the grounds that the mark is merely descriptive of the services and the recitation of services is indefinite].October 18, 2011 - 2 PM: In re Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC, Serial No. 77484850 [Section 2(e)(2) refusal of PITTSBURGH GLASS WORKS for "glass and laminate windshield and windows for vehicles excluding aircraft" on the ground that mark is primarily geographically descriptive].October 19, 2011 - 2 PM: In re Coty US LLC , Serial No. 77631330 [Section 2(d) refusal of… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 10:11 am
Maoz Vegetarian USA, Inc., (D. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 10:29 am
"I know they are permissible under the Supreme Court’s 1990 ruling in the Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
Senate, Governor of Indiana, Governor of Montana, Maryland Senate, Vermont Senate, New York City Council, Southern Medical Association, ESOMAR, NC Pharmacy Association, The Prescription Access Litigation Project, Minnesota Senior Federation, Danske Bank, Sveriges Riksdag, Sveriges Radio Sommar, Svenska Nyhetsbrev AB, Entreprenörsdagen, Stockholms Läns Landsting, Läkemedelskommittén i Jämtlands län, Gräv 08-Undersökande Journalister,… [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
Senate, Governor of Indiana, Governor of Montana, Maryland Senate, Vermont Senate, New York City Council, Southern Medical Association, ESOMAR, NC Pharmacy Association, The Prescription Access Litigation Project, Minnesota Senior Federation, Danske Bank, Sveriges Riksdag, Sveriges Radio Sommar, Svenska Nyhetsbrev AB, Entreprenörsdagen, Stockholms Läns Landsting, Läkemedelskommittén i Jämtlands län, Gräv 08-Undersökande Journalister,… [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:07 pm
Senate, Governor of Indiana, Governor of Montana, Maryland Senate, Vermont Senate, New York City Council, Southern Medical Association, ESOMAR, NC Pharmacy Association, The Prescription Access Litigation Project, Minnesota Senior Federation, Danske Bank, Sveriges Riksdag, Sveriges Radio Sommar, Svenska Nyhetsbrev AB, Entreprenörsdagen, Stockholms Läns Landsting, Läkemedelskommittén i Jämtlands län, Gräv 08-Undersökande Journalister,… [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:07 pm
Senate, Governor of Indiana, Governor of Montana, Maryland Senate, Vermont Senate, New York City Council, Southern Medical Association, ESOMAR, NC Pharmacy Association, The Prescription Access Litigation Project, Minnesota Senior Federation, Danske Bank, Sveriges Riksdag, Sveriges Radio Sommar, Svenska Nyhetsbrev AB, Entreprenörsdagen, Stockholms Läns Landsting, Läkemedelskommittén i Jämtlands län, Gräv 08-Undersökande Journalister,… [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 8:40 am
Senate, Governor of Indiana, Governor of Montana, Maryland Senate, Vermont Senate, New York City Council, Southern Medical Association, ESOMAR, NC Pharmacy Association, The Prescription Access Litigation Project, Minnesota Senior Federation, Danske Bank, Sveriges Riksdag, Sveriges Radio Sommar, Svenska Nyhetsbrev AB, Entreprenörsdagen, Stockholms Läns Landsting, Läkemedelskommittén i Jämtlands län, Gräv 08-Undersökande Journalister,… [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 2:24 pm
Mayan v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:42 am
Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:29 am
Arista Records v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
Jan. 7, 2011) (plaintiffs “cannot show that [defendant] breached its duty by not recalling their vehicle”).While this precedent goes well beyond prescription drug and medical device cases, one of the best cases is from the same court that, long ago, invented strict liability. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 5:15 am
TS Tech USA et al. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 5:15 am
TS Tech USA et al. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:33 pm
Affected vehicles include the 2005-2008 Element, the 2007-2010 CR-V, and 2005-2010 Accords (models with cylinder engines). [read post]
