Search for: "Under Seal 1 v. United States" Results 321 - 340 of 828
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2013, 9:16 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
  Some Congressmen have insisted that no visas should be processed until the District’s borders have been effectively sealed, saying they don’t want to repeat the mistakes the United States has made with its international borders. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:24 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Justice Department wants the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to back its efforts to keep graphic photos depicting the death of Osama bin Laden from seeing the light of day.In a supporting memorandum to its summary judgment motion to the Court in the case of Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
In re Sharp 15-646Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
  The ITC complaint procedure is a favorite tactic by parties because in a relatively short amount of time, usually in a year or less, the ITC can issue exclusion orders which prohibit infringing products from entering the United States. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 10:28 am
  Under the Lanham Act, a federal law, the holder of a mark may ask the United States Patent and Trademark Office to register the mark on the principal register. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Generally speaking, estoppel cannot be used against a state or municipal government (see e.g., New York State Medical Transporters Association v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 5:25 am
 Suing a Chinese company in the United States requires the typical contact inquiry involved in suing any foreign company. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
That agency is the Federal Reserve, the central bank of the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 3:49 pm by Josh Fensterbush
Australia’s legal regime is similar to the United States in that there is a federal government and separate state/territory governments with their own autonomy. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Plaintiff stated claim for a free speech violation where Sheriff allegedly interfered with legal mail; defendants were not entitled to qualified immunity; (2) Qualified immunity applied to alleged Fourth Amendment violation; other claims were waived Haze v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 7:11 am
In compliance with that order, the protocol has been filed with the court under seal. 3 minor changes. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:18 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Failure to comply with the settlement terms could cost Hobby Lobby $2,000 per day.The forfeiture complaint—docketed in the Eastern District of New York as United States v. [read post]