Search for: "United States v. Alvarez" Results 321 - 340 of 660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2021, 1:04 pm by Kate Cox
United States ruling that the government needs an actual search warrant to collect an individual's cell-site location data. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 11:10 am by Milena Sterio
”  According to the complain, the territoriality requirement has been met in this case, because both defendants are American citizens and reside in the United States, because the defendants devised their torture plan in the United States, because they supervised and implemented the plan from the United States, and because the ill-treatment of the three detainees took place while they were held at United… [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 4:46 pm by Sophia Cope
When a company or an employee leads the company’s operations from within the United States and pockets profits from human rights abuses suffered abroad, the courts in the United States must exercise jurisdiction to hold them accountable. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 10:16 am by Anita Davies
This was the conundrum facing the US Supreme Court is the case of United States v Alvarez, concerning the constitutionality of the 2006 “Stolen Valor Act”. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 9:00 pm
Alvarez, 478 F.3d 864, 866-68 (8th Cir. 2007); United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 11:15 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
As reported on the Hunton Employment Labor and Law Blog, on January 20, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Campbell-Ewald v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 5:21 pm by Aaron
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/12/21/05-15916.pdf United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:58 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
” The Court then reviewed the basic criteria in determining whether to grant summary judgment stating: “When considering a motion for summary judgment, the initial test is whether the movant established prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324). [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
” The Court then reviewed the basic criteria in determining whether to grant summary judgment stating: “When considering a motion for summary judgment, the initial test is whether the movant established prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324). [read post]