Search for: "United States v. Blank" Results 321 - 340 of 623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2012, 5:16 am by Jonathan H. Adler
This failing is what doomed the Gun Free School Zones Act in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 4:30 am
That doctrine comes into play when: (1) the federal plaintiff lost in state court; (2) the plaintiff complains of some injury from the state court judgment; (3) the state court judgment antedated the filing of the federal case; and (4) the plaintiff is inviting the federal court to reject the state court judgment.   The plaintiffs appealed that decision to the Third Circuit, and that’s where we are today: Johnson v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 8:00 am
    When the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) announced Chicago would be the country's bid city for the 2016 Olympic Games, Chicago's political and business leaders rejoiced in their joint victory.[1]  Nearly a year after Chicago Mayor Richard Daley formed the Olympic exploratory committee, and nine months after being named one of the U.S. finalists, the USOC threw its support behind the bid city that has quickly achieved front-runner… [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 7:20 am
The Debtors filed a petition seeking relief under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the "Chapter 7 Case"). [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 12:44 am by Bill Otis
 So the "Impeach Earl Warren" crowd was relentlessly dismissed and ridiculed, not without reason.Yesterday, the new version of "Impeach Earl Warren" showed up in the form of Senior United States District Judge Richard Kopf, who, in expressing his disagreement with the Hobby Lobby decision, point-blank told his superiors on the Supreme Court to "shut the f*ck up. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:19 am by John Jascob
SEC, the Supreme Court held in a 7-2 decision that the SEC’s administrative law judges (“ALJ”) are “officers of the United States,” and thereby subject to the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 6:41 am by Faiza Patel
” In addition, the sole justification provided by the administration for acting against Khalil is a single line in the Notice to Appear in immigration court: “The Secretary of State has determined that your presence or activities in the United States would have serious adverse policy consequences for the foreign policy of the United States,” citing 237(A)(4)(c)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
Blanke, Mercer University Is Privacy Privacy? [read post]