Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 321 - 340
of 9,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2023, 7:01 am
Volokh v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 7:00 am
United States, the Court will decide whether the Direct Tax Clauses of the Constitution prohibit Congress from imposing wealth taxes. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
" In Regan v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
The United States filed its response brief yesterday in Moore v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 1:06 pm
See United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 12:48 pm
Victims of trucking accidents may be entitled to substantial compensation for funeral expenses, medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and more.Big Rig Accidents in the United StatesIn the United States, trucking accidents are notoriously dangerous. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 12:48 pm
Victims of trucking accidents may be entitled to substantial compensation for funeral expenses, medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and more.Big Rig Accidents in the United StatesIn the United States, trucking accidents are notoriously dangerous. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Back in March, the Supreme Court invited the solicitor general to file a brief expressing the views of the United States on these cases. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am
The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals has explained the relationship between the two subsections as follows: The more that a claimed cost satisfies the business necessity requirement in subsection (c), the more the contractor’s burden to satisfy the benefit requirement in subsection (b) is reduced. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 1:50 pm
Sackett v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 11:51 am
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Murray v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 7:08 am
Suriano v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 11:19 am
Barton “Buzz” Thompson served as special master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Robbins, and Kisor v. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 6:21 am
The Constitution constrains states from excessively burdening out-of-state commerce – a doctrine known as the dormant commerce clause, because it is implicit in the grant of power to Congress to regulate interstate commerce. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
Smith, which holds that laws of general applicability that burden religious exercise are not subject to strict scrutiny. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 12:50 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, case number 1:23-cv-02950, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 6:53 am
"] In U.S. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 5:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
United StatesState of Minnesota v. [read post]
