Search for: "United States v. Certain Real Estate Property"
Results 321 - 340
of 552
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2015, 10:50 am
Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 8:39 am
For questions relating to this article or any other California land use, real estate, environmental and/or planning issues contact Abbott & Kindermann, LLP at (916) 456-9595. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 11:36 pm
”)…While we have held that a sale is “not limited to the transfer of tangible property” but may also be determined by “the agreement by which such a transfer takes place,” Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 5:44 am
’s opposition to registration of the mark CHANEL for “real estate development and construction of commercial, residential and hotel property,” finding the mark likely to cause dilution-by-blurring of opposer’s famous CHANEL mark. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
Conan Doyle Estate, Ltd., 755 F. 3d 496 (7th. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 3:29 pm
The defendants argued that Counts IV and V were time-barred pursuant to Section 13-214 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 735 ILCS 5/13-214, which provides statutes of limitation and repose for real estate construction claims. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:33 pm
More than three years later, in March 2010, the wife filed a chapter 7 bankruptcy case in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA), Norfolk Division. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 6:45 am
Operators no longer have to pay for the maintenance or repositioning of the hotel real estate. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
Section 101(35A) of the Bankruptcy Code defines “intellectual property” for purposes of the protections of Section 365(n), using either general terms or references to provisions of the United States Code. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
Section 101(35A) of the Bankruptcy Code defines “intellectual property” for purposes of the protections of Section 365(n), using either general terms or references to provisions of the United States Code. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 11:37 am
All persons are equally free and independent, and have certain natural, inherent, and unalienable rights which they retain when forming any government, amongst which are the enjoying, defending, and preserving of their life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting real and personal property, making binding contracts of their choosing, and pursuing their happiness and safety.Section 2. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 1:14 am
The defendants include several related members of a family, the Rubins, as well as a real estate attorney and a real estate appraiser. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:04 am
In fact, because so many chose a condominium as a preferred type of home ownership in Florida has meant that our state legislature has had to address countless unique legal issues related to this type of real estate ownership. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:34 am
For questions relating to this article or any other California land use, real estate, environmental and/or planning issues contact Abbott & Kindermann, LLP at (916) 456-9595. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 1:55 pm
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 8:45 pm
Although the first prong of this two-prong test is not labeled as such, it is essentially the same type of inquiry as the "predominant purpose/secondary effects" test enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in City of Renton v. [read post]
