Search for: "United States v. Cores"
Results 321 - 340
of 3,998
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
The Commerce Clause, in Nation and States,” at the U.S. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 7:31 am
It is considered one of the core cases defining free speech in the United States. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:12 pm
Doe of the equal protection of the law guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution for reasons of a personal nature unrelated to their official duties…. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:21 am
Nautica Apparel, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
The third speaks to the alignment of the first two with the overarching political-normative structures of both the political unit that seeks to regulate, and superior domain into which it is embedded. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 1:53 pm
Over the next 10 days, more than 145 representatives of Member States of the United Nations will invest 60 hours in deliberations, aiming for consensus on most provisions. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 7:01 am
., homicide, drug-trafficking, robberies and “pre-capture terrorist offenses not related to the conflict” (Martinez (2019) 83 referring to U.S. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
In a nutshell, Western States – led by Germany and the United States – support a “hybrid” tribunal, while Ukraine and a “Core Group” of Friends for Accountability, notably comprising several former victim States of Russian empire, advocate an international tribunal, created through a United Nations General Assembly resolution. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
The core theory of the Dormant Commerce Clause (DCC) is that some state regulations of interstate commerce--especially protectionist ones--infringe on a presumptive congressional policy of treating the United States as a free-trade zone. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:37 am
As a result, for such speech to be actionable as a violation of the MARPC, it must meet the high standard set forth by the United States Supreme Court in New York Times v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:04 am
From Smiley v. [read post]
13 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
This contradicts what we know about who purchases cryptocurrency in the United States and why. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 10:18 am
They become part of international law, and in the United States, treaties have the same force as federal law. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
In Rucho v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
In fact, analysis of historical data from 1946-2022, cross-referenced with regime-type data from V-Dem, reveals that a successful coup has never occurred in a liberal democracy in Sub-Saharan Africa. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
This is the third segment in EFF’s series on the proposed UN Cybercrime Convention focusing on Chapter V, International Cooperation. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
Read Part I for a quick snapshot of the ins and outs of the zero draft; Part III for a deep dive on Chapter V regarding international cooperation: the historical context, the zero draft's approach, scope of cooperation, and protection of personal data, and Part IV, which deals with the criminalization of security research.The United Nations Headquarters in New York City is poised to become the epicenter of one of the most concerning global debates affecting human rights in the… [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 2:01 pm
Among other things, it completely disregards the role of the Electoral Count Act – and, even more fundamentally, of Article II of the Constitution in empowering Congress to set the “Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes, which Day shall be the same throughout the United States. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm
Ms Martin-Pratt is currently the Deputy Director General of Directorate Trade and previously served as the Head of Copyright Unit of the Commission’s Communications, Networks, Content and Technology DG, among other, earlier illustrious posts. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
The implications of the filing were captured on CNN, where host Kaitlan Collins explained that “the First Amendment does not allow the President of the United States to go and claim there was fraud when he was told there was not fraud…” That is, of course, entirely wrong. [read post]
