Search for: "United States v. Cox" Results 321 - 340 of 507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2018, 8:00 am by David Kris, Nate Jones
And if the president and Bolton do decide to attack Iran or North Korea, will they do so in conformity with the laws of the United States and the law of armed conflict? [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 7:07 am by Jonathan Bailey
Rubin at Bloomberg Law reports that the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) heard oral arguments in the case of Georgia v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:35 pm by Richard J. Pierce, Jr.
” Francisco argued that a “good cause” limit on the power to remove officers of the United States conflicts with the power the U.S. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
Article I, for example, provided that Clinton “willfully corrupted and manipulated the judicial process of the United States” by “impeding the administration of justice. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 6:39 am by Marty Lederman
In an article here back in July, I explained why Judge Cannon is wrong and why the Supreme Court was correct to hold in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the November 8 conference) United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
Jane announced that the Fourth Circuit affirmed the 2012 refusal to vacate the sentence in the United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Carey National Music Publishers' Association: BMG v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:51 am by Venkat
(See also the Cox case from last month: "Facebook Posting That Someone Has Herpes Is Criminal Harassment--Pennsylvania v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:49 am by Broc Romanek
KPMG (certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit) and Teachers' Retirement System of Louisiana v. [read post]