Search for: "United States v. Flowers" Results 321 - 340 of 393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
: Catnic Components Ltd & Anor v Hill and Smith Ltd (Spicy IP)   United States US Patents BPAI rules for ex parte appeals: Request for comment and notice of roundtable (Patently-O) Bilski and Warsaw share insights (AwakenIP)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) You say tomato... [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 9:15 am by Richard Hunt
The internet is everywhere, and most e-commerce websites make products or services available everywhere in the United States. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 4:35 am
Even so, administration officials have continued to promote the idea that the United States should wield its military power early, often and unilaterally to secure its interests around the world. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:14 pm by Randy Barnett
Illinois, which upheld the denial to women of the privilege of practicing law.The article now begins with these two quotes:The Fourteenth Amendment is universally presumed to be the outcome of the organized antislavery movement in the United States, yet its modern history continues to be written without reference to the abolitionists. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm by georgbrem
The crossing, at the Upper Lars checkpoint in the Caucasus mountains, has been closed since 2006, when relations began growing tense, in part because of efforts by the Georgian president, Mikheil Saakashvili, to align himself more closely with the United States. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 7:21 am
The Georgia cerebral palsy resource guide was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
” At Medium, Nick Lum points out that the South Dakota attorney general, who represented the state in South Dakota v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 1:06 am
Flowers (9th Cir. 2005) 408 F.3d 1113 (“SOS”) and Wetlands Action Network v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:36 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch), Mr Justice Arnold (High Court, England and Wales) felt it appropriate to refer a number of questions to the European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling on the legality of the purchase and use of words including a third party's trade mark as a keyword (see earlier IPKat post here). [read post]