Search for: "United States v. Hammer"
Results 321 - 340
of 389
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2010, 7:30 pm
And although the State contended that a ruling covering both misadvice and omission would lead to a “flood” of challenges of existing guilty pleas made by noncitizen defendants, the Court countered that a similar concern was raised in Hill v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 1:36 pm
Yesterday, in United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 8:56 pm
Supreme Court had ruled that attorney advertising fell under the protection of the "free speech" clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:13 am
Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Brief for the federal respondents in opposition Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States Title: Hammer v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:03 am
Still, nowhere is it written that when the shells come out, the mark can’t take a hammer to them.Footnotes1 Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 4:29 pm
Last week the petitioners in City of Ontario v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 5:31 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) United States US General iSlate, iTablet, IP! [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 9:53 am
The recent i4i v. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 1:12 pm
If there's no one, from the Governor to the United States Attorney to the indicted Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to the judges to the lawyers to the citizens, with the guts to take him on, then why waste more time or bandwidth on Joe Arpaio? [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am
Respondents' Argument US Solicitor General Elena Kagan argued the case for the United States, which previously intervened in the case. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:00 pm
§ 101 rejections of software-based method claims in light of In re Bilski (FoundPersuasive) US Patents – Decisions District Court E D Texas: Computerised business method patent fails Bilski test under 35 USC 101: H&R Block Tax Services v Jackson Hewitt Tax Services Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Internet archive website is admissible evidence in touchscreen keyboard patent case: SP Techs, LLC v Garmin Int’l,… [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 1:46 pm
The United States, which is the only nation in the world that imposes such a sentence for non-homicide juvenile offenses, has 109 inmates in that category. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:33 am
Those lawyers-Texas solo Dan Perez and Michigan-based Patrick Anderson, both of whom frequently work for Spangenberg and his patent companies-quickly hammered out the $4.2 million settlement. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 1:34 pm
The case is US v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 6:05 am
United States of America (C.D.Cal. [read post]
