Search for: "United States v. House of Representatives of United States"
Results 321 - 340
of 4,566
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2019, 4:10 am
In C.F. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:47 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:21 am
Muskrat v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am
United States, which created multiple tests for what constituted “waters of the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am
United States, which created multiple tests for what constituted “waters of the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am
United States, which created multiple tests for what constituted “waters of the United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 5:31 pm
In California, of course, state officials resumed recognizing same-sex marriages following the United States Supreme Court's June 2013 decision in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:56 pm
It is Congress, not the president, that has the power to “provide for the ... general welfare,” “to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states,” to appropriate money, and “to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution” all “powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 10:01 am
That year, the Court handed down Hamdan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 11:06 am
United States (Class Action Settlement Agreement)Peggy Fontenot v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 11:06 am
United States (Class Action Settlement Agreement)Peggy Fontenot v. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
The Alagoas (a Brazilian northeastern state) House of Representatives has recently overruled a governor’s veto to pass the Educational Neutrality Act (ENA) (“Programa Escola Livre”), a law on public education allegedly restrictive of teachers’ rights to freedom of expression. [read post]
7 May 2019, 8:30 am
” Another interesting dispute over inherent contempt citations took place in 1917, when a House subcommittee had United States attorney H. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:49 am
HR6090, which passed the House of Representatives Wednesday by a 320-91 vote, would provide, in relevant part, For purposes of this Act, the term "definition of antisemitism"— (1) means the definition of antisemitism adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA [International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance], of which the United States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department of State; and (2) includes the… [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:48 am
In De Lucia v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 5:00 am
Section V analyzes the Oath or Affirmation Clause, which suggests that Senators and Representatives, as well as the President, are not "Officers of the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 8:02 am
Bizarre, unconstitutional, and terrifying if you are the defendant.The situation is made worse by the fact that the SEC appointed some of its in-house judges in violation of the United States Consitution, causing further constitutional issues, and causing many respondents to challenge the process, and seek to overturn the decisions of these judges.The United States Supreme Court has agreed to address the appointment issue in Lucia v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 7:12 am
Immigration lawyers, reeling from yesterday’s defeat in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 10:24 am
The United States Bankruptcy Court in Denver, Colorado, through the Honorable Michael Romero, provided an order regarding plaintiffs’ problems with a home they purchased from an entity controlled or represented by defendants. [read post]
