Search for: "United States v. Interstate General Co."
Results 321 - 340
of 458
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2009, 12:05 am
Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am
The DTSA requires a plaintiff to demonstrate (1) the existence of a trade secret, defined generally as information with independent economic value that the owner has taken reasonable measures to keep secret; (2) that the trade secret is related to a product or service used in, or intended for use in, interstate or foreign commerce; and (3) the misappropriation of that trade secret, defined broadly as the knowing improper acquisition, or use or disclosure of the secret. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
Claiborne Hardware Co. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
United States (09-977); United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
For example, in United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 1:11 pm
The NFA can be found in Title 26, Chapter 53, of the United States Code. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:47 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 7:24 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:32 am
Wells Fargo & Co., 20-866. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 11:05 am
Co. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
In general, all securities offered in the United States must be registered with the SEC or must qualify for an exemption from the registration requirements. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm
Weekly D342aContracts -- Home construction -- Retention of purchase deposit after buyer cancelled due to delay that was neither party's fault -- Consumer law -- Section 501.1375, which requires a building contractor or developer to hold certain deposits of a prospective buyer of a one- or two-family residential dwelling unit in an escrow account unless the buyer waives the escrow requirements in writing, does not apply to general contractor who contracts to build single-family… [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:45 pm
He wrote well-known dissents in several previous cases striking down congressional laws on federalism grounds, including United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm
In the landmark case of Wickard v. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
The Supreme Court has since reaffirmed this holding, most prominently in a case called Square D Co. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:30 am
Horton responded by filing a petition for review of the NLRB’s decision with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
By virtue of a 2003 ruling of the state’s highest court, in Goodridge v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:01 pm
In altering the common law—which is state law—Congress must exercise one of its enumerated powers (such as the Article I power to regulate interstate commerce). [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 9:41 am
The records produced pursuant to those warrants incriminated the defendant and a co-defendant. [read post]
