Search for: "United States v. Jay" Results 321 - 340 of 737
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2021, 2:00 pm by Peter Margulies
(p. 29) In contrast, the ban only applies to foreign nationals who are seeking to enter the United States. [read post]
30 May 2008, 8:24 am
Lauderdale is assisting on the internet pharmacy case, United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 8:00 am
    When the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) announced Chicago would be the country's bid city for the 2016 Olympic Games, Chicago's political and business leaders rejoiced in their joint victory.[1]  Nearly a year after Chicago Mayor Richard Daley formed the Olympic exploratory committee, and nine months after being named one of the U.S. finalists, the USOC threw its support behind the bid city that has quickly achieved front-runner… [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:20 am by Kiran Bhat
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., the Court considered whether copyrighted works made and purchased abroad can be bought and sold within the United States without the copyright owner’s permission. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Calvin Johnson For the Symposium on Michael Klarman, The Framers' Coup: The Making of the United States Constitution.Michael Klarman’s The Framers’ Coup: The Making of the United States Constitution (Oxford 2016) is an opponent’s history of the adoption of the American Constitution. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 11:51 am by Danielle D'Onfro
Moreover, the city and its amici contend that the court has already determined that § 542(a) permits creditors to remain in possession of debtors’ property notwithstanding § 362 in the bankruptcy chestnut United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:29 pm by Ajay Sarma, Christiana Wayne
Kurup discussed the Supreme Court’s decision to hear United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
At The National Law Review, Evan Seeman looks at the court’s order late last week in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 6:24 am by Jack Goldsmith
  However, as Rob Howse notes, the definition is limited at the beginning of Subsection (h)(1) to an agreement that “includes the United States, commits the United States to take action, or pursuant to which the United States commits or otherwise agrees to take action. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 8:41 pm by Kurt R. Karst
Such penalty shall accrue to the United States and may be recovered in a civil action brought by the Commission, in its own name by any of its attorneys designated by it for such purpose, in a district court of the United States against any party that violates this section. [read post]