Search for: "United States v. Knife" Results 321 - 340 of 384
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2011, 2:40 am by Jeff Gamso
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated our judgment and remanded this case to us for further consideration in light of  Florida v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm by Susan Hennessey, Helen Klein Murillo
This provision makes it a crime to steal, sell, or convey “any record, voucher, money, or thing of value of the United States or of any department or agency thereof. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am by INFORRM
The allegation that Mr Hwang would “stab” Ms Kim “with a knife” would have been understood as hyperbole and a metaphor bullying behaviour in the context [43-44]. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 2:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
Now that many states like Florida have, in recent years, have rejected the duty to retreat, the “no need to retreat” rule appears to be the supermajority rule in the United States, though there is still a substantial minority of the states that adopt a duty to retreat. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 1:08 pm by John Ross
He flees to the United States, where he seeks asylum on the ground that he will be tortured if returned to Syria. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Furthermore, in Handyside v United Kingdom Strasbourg accepted that freedom of speech applies to views which shock and offend and which are heartily disapproved of by the recipient [49]. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:17 pm by Aaron Pelley
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/289915.dis.doc.pdf Federal Law United States Supreme Court United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
An actor brandished this real bowie knife as a prop while pretending to stab an 11-year-old boy’s foot. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:16 am by Roger Parloff
” The defendants ought to serve lengthy terms of incarceration because of their participation in a months-long conspiracy that aimed to oppose by force the authority of the United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:57 am by Colin Murray
It is wishful thinking, therefore, to argue, as  Stewart Jackson (Peterborough) (Con) does, that: Is not it true that the recent case of Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom specifically allows the Government to proceed with a range of policy options, which, like the consultation in 2009, could be put out for public discussion? [read post]