Search for: "United States v. Manufacturers National Bank"
Results 321 - 333
of 333
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2007, 11:59 pm
Visit Large Law Firm
Law.com ®
10 United Nations Plaza, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102 (800) 903-9872. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 6:30 pm
Supply v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 6:15 pm
For example, the Unite States government has stimulated interest and investment in entrepreneurial space ventures especially through the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), which "aims to use commercially available space vehicles to transport crew and cargo to the International Space Station. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Franklin, No. 05-2539, 05-2680, 05-2693 A sentence for bank robbery charges imposed following a remand for resentencing is vacated and remanded pursuant to the government's claims of error that: 1) the dis [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:40 am
Pakhomious Coptic Orthodox Church an application for a real property tax exemption 599
A7936
Jaffee -- Authorizes Congregation Ribnitz, Inc. to retroactively apply for a property tax exemption 598
A7905
Lopez V (MS) -- Relates to the shelter allowance for individuals and families receiving public assistance and residing in city, state, or federal public housing 597
A7892
Brook-Krasny (MS) -- Relates to shareholder votes in… [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
For the reasons stated below, we REVERSE the district court's denial of the State's motion for clarification and REMAND with instructions that the district court grant the State's motion for clarification consistent with this opinion. 07a0294p.06 2007/08/03 Williams v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
" in the same paragraph in Westlaw produced 16 hits just in the United States Supreme Court - as recent as Watters v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 3:51 pm
He represented the FDIC as Receiver of United States National Bank in San Diego, California, between 1973 and 1983. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 3:51 pm
He represented the FDIC as Receiver of United States National Bank in San Diego, California, between 1973 and 1983. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 6:24 am
(United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 3:32 am
" The report says the United States is poised to do well in providing services in and to China because of its "overall competitive edge ... in services; increasing "tradability" of services from one part of the world to another; the easing of restrictions for foreign firms providing services in Asian countries; and the absence or underdevelopment of services in many emerging nations. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 9:41 am
My rough sense is that the tax on the award in Murphy is authorized by Article I, section 8, and by the Necessary and Proper Clause, and, more importantly, is not a prohibited "direct" tax under Article I, section 9, just as with estate taxes (see Manufacturers National Bank, 363 U.S. 194) and gift taxes (see Bromley v. [read post]
21 Nov 2005, 1:03 pm
What is less understood, however, is how the new law could hurt the entire United States economy, and consequently, the financial wellbeing of all Americans. [read post]
