Search for: "United States v. Michael" Results 321 - 340 of 6,671
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:01 pm by Christopher Mathews
Last week, AFCCA heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 1:19 am
The major decision he wrote was in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 5:02 am by Wes Anderson
Unlike other jurisdictions (such as the United States), China does not require proof of use for a trademark to obtain registration. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 8:30 am by Karen Tani
Arah (Bowie State University) reviews FLAGRANT CONDUCT: THE STORY OF LAWRENCE v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:00 am
On January 2, 2024, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan issued an order to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
United States (07-513), on whether courts must suppress evidence seized during an arrest made as a result of faulty information provided by another law enforcement agency. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 10:08 am by Beth Stephens
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:00 am by Richard Jasik
  The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri granted in part and denied in part defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. [read post]