Search for: "United States v. Nixon"
Results 321 - 340
of 841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Constructive Ambiguity of the Budapest Memorandum at 28: Making Sense of the Controversial Agreement
7 Feb 2023, 5:31 am
” And they reaffirmed the positive and negative security assurances to all non-nuclear states under the NPT previously made by nuclear powers, including Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Past practice--including in the Nixon tapes case and Bush v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:59 am
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 10:09 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 11:12 am
” The Court later reaffirmed its broad view of corruption in Nixon v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:49 am
The clause says the president “shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:49 am
Trump v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:05 pm
” —New York Times Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
In considering enforcement of the subpoena in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 7:01 am
Thus, for instance, in United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:06 pm
Many of these are drawn from research for the book Ballot Battles: The History of Disputed Elections in the United States as well as work done for the American Law Institute’s Principles of Law—Election Administration project. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 6:52 pm
Lovett, 328 U.S. 303 (1946)United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
In his 5-4 majority opinion, Justice Lewis Powell said that Nixon, as “a former President of the United States, is entitled to absolute immunity from damages liability predicated on his official acts. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 1:05 pm
In the 67-page motion, Trump argues for absolute immunity, citing Nixon v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
See Leser v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
Supp. 51 (D.D.C. 1973) (holding that the $10,000 jurisdictional amount in controversy requirement then in the statute (it's since been eliminated) was not satisfied); United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 7:10 am
Do you want the Supreme Court to overturn Citizens United or Roe v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:32 am
In the United States v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am
” It was important for the House to enhance the judiciary committee’s subpoena powers in 1974 and 1998 because of the state of the chamber’s rules at the time. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
“The Jehovah’s Witnesses also are responsible for the landmark opinion in West Virginia State Bd of Educ v. [read post]
