Search for: "United States v. Singh" Results 321 - 340 of 375
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2022, 9:03 pm by Bryn Hines
The guidance, issued in the aftermath of the Dobbs v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:00 am by Hayley Evans
Last summer, tech companies followed suit, with CEOs including Elon Musk signing an Open Letter to the United Nations Convention on Certain Chemical Weapons. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:04 am by INFORRM
In Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd Tugendhat J had stated that whatever definition of what is defamatory was adopted, ‘it must include a qualification or threshold of seriousness, so as to exclude trivial claims’. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
On 29 June 2023, judgment was handed down in R v Dent, 2023 ONCA 460. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
The Constitution Bench of this Court in Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia and Others v. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm by INFORRM
United States USA today had a piece “Rudy Giuliani’s ‘Borat 2’ scene: What can he do about it legally? [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 6:15 am
Laufer (The Wharton School), on Saturday, November 28, 2020 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School (by… [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 9:34 pm by Aparna Chandra
An egregious example of this approach is the Supreme Court’s decision in Baldev Singh v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
But there is no compelling reason to introduce a “public figure” limitation in libel cases, as applies in the United States of America. (3) The defence of “truth” The burden of proving that what has been published is substantially true remains on the defendant. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
The libel claim brought by His Holiness Sant Baba Jeet Singh Ji Maharaj against journalist Hardeep Singh was finally dismissed by the Court of Appeal when the claimant failed to lodge the £200,000 security for costs. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
The News Media Association has said there are “grounds for judicial review” of the decision to recognise Impress as a state-approved press regulator. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Claimant lawyers dealing with pre-publication matters will doubtless rely on certain observations made by Nickin J about the Second Defendant’s conduct in the case of Turley v UNITE the Union & Anor [2019] EWHC 3547. [read post]