Search for: "United States v. State of Minnesota" Results 321 - 340 of 1,813
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm by Peter Jacobs
” In District of Columbia v. [read post]
Eleven states (Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, Oklahoma and West Virginia) explicitly limit the total number of ballots an individual may deliver, notarize or authorize on behalf of voters. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am by Brett Raffish
§ 1983, provides: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State ... subjects ... any citizen of the United States ... to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law[.] [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Justice Viviano’s concurring and dissenting opinion explicitly calls for “adopting the approach to nondelegation advocated by Justice Gorsuch in Gundy v United States” (p 29 of his opinion). [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 3:15 pm by Eugene Volokh
In general, courts evaluate the validity of a law that regulates expressive conduct under the standard articulated in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Guest Blogger
  That did not happen in the United States, and the authors provide some insight into why. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
  United Food and Commercial Workers Union (UFCW) v. the U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 12:30 pm by Richard Hasen
In her dissent in the 2002 case Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Tia Sewell, Anna Salvatore
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s Sept. 2 decision on United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2020, 4:41 am by SHG
He has orally argued 41 cases before the Supreme Court of the United States, with 39 of them in the last decade. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am by Jason Rantanen
” From the Introduction:  On August 11, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down its opinion in one of the most closely-watched, and potentially consequential, antitrust decisions in recent years, Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]