Search for: "United States v. Various Articles of Device" Results 321 - 340 of 494
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
  He is unpersuaded that the post-Shevill case law should be reversed but suggests that, in addition, a “focalisation” principle should apply, using the context of the statement in question to determine which Member State’s jurisdiction is the most appropriate. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 12:44 pm by Eric Schweibenz
No. 337-TA-817 would “negatively affect the public health and welfare in the United States, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, or United States Consumers. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 1:43 pm by Sandy Levinson
  But his skepticism about oaths certainly extends to quasi-religious oaths like those exacted from the President and, under Article VI, all public officials, whether state or national. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:59 pm
Their comments are premised on the presumption that AHIs are caused by a malign state based capability being deliberately applied against American human targets in various overseas and domestic locations. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:58 am by Eugene Volokh
" The court concluded that the age verification requirement was unconstitutional for various reasons, including that Ashcroft v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 11:18 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
In the United States, Congress has largely ignored the challenge of reconciling efficacy and legitimacy in arbitration, as have the states even when establishing statutory regimes to govern arbitration conducted in their territory. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:13 am by Florian Mueller
After Google's recent--and expected (this blog was first to report that it was coming)--petition to the Supreme Court of the United States for writ of certiorari (i.e., for a review of the Federal Circuit's decision in Oracle's favor, see my refresher Q&A after the appellate decision), I have seen a couple of articles that described the state of affairs and quoted observers on what all of this meant. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm by Robert B. Milligan
Some states require the plaintiff to provide a specific trade secret disclosure document before discovery commences. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Held, only three of the eight articles were defamatory at common law. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:37 am by SHG
[v] The Manual would serve as an excellent policy model for state prosecutors to adopt. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
" (3)However, some nations such as the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have at points sought to make methods of execution less liable to bungling or to inflicting gratuitous suffering. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:02 am by Stephanie Pell
” They are able to “come into the United States and rapidly use an internet service provider, come up and do their activities and take that down before a warrant can be issued, before we can actually have surveillance by a civilian authority here in the United States. [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
 The Times of Malta has a piece entitled Criminal libel is history as new media law comes into force United States Summer Zevros’ defamation case against President has proceeded to its initial evidence gathering stage following the New York Appeals court denying a motion to stay the case filed [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
 In my view, federal courts are unduly sensitive to claims of prior restraint while states like California and Ohio have been more inclined to balance the various interests in these disputes. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 7:36 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Amidst the various commentary on the Supreme Court's decision to prevent the Trump Administration from rescinding DACA in Dept. of Homeland Security v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:06 pm by Xandra Kramer
Furthermore, the parent company claimed that a case against Vedanta is “a device in order to ensure that the real claim, against, KCM, is litigated in the United Kingdom rather than in Zambia” (para 51). [read post]