Search for: "Unknown Plaintiff v. Unknown Defendants" Results 321 - 340 of 1,544
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  Default judgment had been entered in favour of the plaintiff. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Berger, Lehman Assoc., 253 A.D2d 484 [2d Dept 1998 [“The Supreme Court properly declined to dismiss the plaintiff’s first cause of action alleging negligent misrepresentation, as the record reveals that the relationship between the plaintiff and the defendants was so close as to be the functional equivalent of privity. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 3:33 pm by Richard Hunt
The Court makes an important distinction between standing to sue and claims that must be defended, holding that while a plaintiff may have standing to seek relief with respect to unknown barriers to access they can ultimately prevail only by showing that the barriers they have pleaded continue to exist. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  An injunction was granted against named defendants but, following the Canada Goose case a final order against persons unknown was refused. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Deferral of specifics of mitigation is proper “where the local agency commits itself to mitigation and lists the alternatives to be considered, analyzed and possibly incorporated into the mitigation plan” (quoting Defend the Bay v. [read post]