Search for: "Van Order v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,564
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm
I’ll address only the first of these in this post (sequels to follow), but for completeness the principles are: Human beings are not consistently rational actors; Consumer preferences are not always the same as consumer interests; Winning is not the most important thing; Solitude matters as much as engagement; The optimal situation is neither order nor anarchy but one allowing flow between those states. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm
On 13 October 2020 there was a statement in open court in the case of Warnes v Forge before Warby J. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 2:49 am
The behaviour of the tax authority is compared to that of a diligent and fair administration in order to assess whether the aid was granted, thus forcing Member States to adopt anti-elusive tools and carry out careful ex ante evaluations of the tax rulings proposed by multinationals. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm
Human Rights Watch has released a report stating that companies like Facebook, Twitter and Youtube are right to quickly remove content that could incite violence or jeopardise national security or public order, but that permanent removal with no archive access can hamper efforts for accountability and journalistic investigation. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 6:36 pm
A third case that I am watching is Van Buren v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:47 am
It covers all types of imports and exports of products.[2] Any national measure enacted by Member States which has the effect of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, trade in the internal market is to be considered as having an effect equivalent to quantitative restrictions.[3] The Court of Justice of the European Union [“CJEU”] has explained that national measures subjecting the internal trade of goods to prior authorization restrict access to the market… [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 10:28 pm
Therefore, the servient estate could not obstruct the natural waterway and was ordered to replace the tile. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:37 am
Blake was ordered to get on the ground and refused to comply. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 12:00 am
Finding it difficult to keep up with an ever-changing world in the midst of a health, environmental, social and political crisis, while keeping up with patent law? [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 2:17 am
In cases where this is not the case, the child is ordered back to the State of habitual residence, often with measures of protection. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:45 pm
A recent decision by the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in Downey v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 4:35 am
Decisions this Week United States Trump v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 8:30 am
Item: Protestors arrested in Portland who appear before federal magistrates for bond are being ordered, as a condition of release, not to attend any public protests:“Defendant may not attend any other protests, rallies, assemblies or public gathering in the state of Oregon,” states one “Order Setting Conditions of Release”So much for the sanctity and respect we have for our federal courts. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 8:13 am
Western State Center, Inc. et al v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 4:22 am
He stated that the strategy must keep in mind the brand owner’s objectives in order to formulate the best approach. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:44 am
On May 29, two contracted Federal Protective Service officers were shot outside the Ronald V. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 2:35 pm
Mosman's opinion yesterday in Rosenblum v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
The lawsuit states that armed, unidentified federal officers dressed in camouflage confronted people protesting police brutality and detained them in unmarked vans. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 3:48 am
Schecter in Van Horne v Ben-Dov, preliminarily enjoining a freeze-out merger of a close corporation for lack of a valid business purpose. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:42 am
Lord Mance stressed that the so-called Miller decisions of the Supreme Court in R (Miller) v Secretary of State [2017] UKSC 5 and R (Miller) v The Prime Minister, Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland (Miller II) [2019] UKSC 41, dealing with the parliamentary procedure of the withdrawal from the EU, are extraordinary regarding the degree of judicial activism from a British point of view. [read post]
