Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 321 - 340
of 6,668
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2023, 7:44 am
A proposed election map moves thousands of Black voters to a different district to gain a political advantage. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 12:27 pm
The case Milligan v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:00 pm
In Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 4:10 am
Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 12:11 pm
(Criminal Jurisdiction) Pretends Eagle v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 10:16 am
They sue for fraudulent inducement and promissory estoppel.The case is Cordova v. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 5:49 am
Watkins cited Ronnie Lee Johnson v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:59 pm
On August 8, 2023, in Lacy v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 3:20 pm
LaRose, and another dismissal in League of Women Voters of Ohio v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 3:15 pm
Gainesville Women Care, LLC v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:44 am
VOTER EDUCATION, VOTER REGISTRATION, AND GOTV EFFORTS The right to vote is essential to a well-functioning democracy. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:23 am
Larue v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 2:29 pm
The case, Allen v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:18 pm
The paradigmatic “generalized grievance” is a voter who shares an injury with all other prospective voters — and there is no Article III jurisdiction over the case … Another (Stilley v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 3:51 am
If not voters, then who? [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 8:54 am
See, e.g., Drake v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 3:43 pm
An impartial and non-partisan federal judiciary was having none of his unsupported claims of election fraud or his extreme requests to disenfranchise millions of voters. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:10 pm
I asked the UCLA Emmett Institute’s Distinguished Counsel Mary Nichols to share her thoughts after reading the decision in Held v. [read post]