Search for: "W. T. Grant Company, in the Matter of" Results 321 - 340 of 936
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Courts do not require companies to be pessimistic in assessing arguably negative results; they merely require that companies be honest in their statements and forthcoming with the relevant underlying facts. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
A study that examined the activity of patent assertion entities in the German patent market also confirmed these data: T. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 9:53 am
It was to Patent Office Commissioner Casper W. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Some insider trading cases are straightforward, such as when a corporate executive trades stock in his or her company before the company’s earnings announcement. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 2:06 pm by Employment Lawyers
As a practical matter, there is a tremendous downside to employing independent contractors. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 12:06 am by Gene Takagi
For many girls, school isn’t just a key to a better future, it’s a lifeline, protecting them from exploitation & violence. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:42 pm
It states "[t]he owner of the legal title to property is presumed to be the owner of the full beneficial title. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 10:53 am by Tobin Admin
The trial court granted summary judgment for the mother and her company on all of the passenger’s claims. [read post]
Plaintiff argued that “because Meril never actually used the devices after their importation, its safe harbor defense fails as a matter of law. [read post]
Plaintiff argued that “because Meril never actually used the devices after their importation, its safe harbor defense fails as a matter of law. [read post]
Plaintiff argued that “because Meril never actually used the devices after their importation, its safe harbor defense fails as a matter of law. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 9:53 am by Eric Citron
Neil Gorsuch was appointed to the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit by President George W. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
  Thus, the court concluded that because the company gave the employee permission to access its computer, he did not act `without authorization’ when he acted for purposes contrary to the company's interest, both while employed by the company and then after he left the company. [read post]