Search for: "WATER POWER v. Human Rights" Results 321 - 340 of 619
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2015, 2:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  CTRL-C and CTRL-V are considered sacred symbols. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 3:48 pm
(Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council )The United Nations Human Rights Council has a number of interests. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:20 pm by Quinta Jurecic , Staley Smith
The UK’s Investigatory Powers Tribunal ruled in favor of two international human rights NGOs, stating that the GCHQ’s covert surveillance of the groups’ emails was illegal. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:21 pm by Guest Blogger
(Bizarrely, this proportionality test was borrowed from decisions of the European Court of Human Rights.) [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Coming this Thursday, June 11: Cato conference marks tenth anniversary of eminent domain/property rights case Kelo v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:10 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Resource Investments v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
| Oprah Winfrey and OWN YOUR POWER trade mark | EPO December Administrative Council Meeting | Blurred Lines | Again on Actavis v Boehringer | Is the EU Patent Package diminishing the EU’s powers? [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:11 am by Naomi Roht-Arriaza
Many human rights defenders have been attacked while defending their communities and land. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
| Oprah Winfrey and OWN YOUR POWER trade mark | EPO December Administrative Council Meeting | Blurred Lines | Again on Actavis v Boehringer | Is the EU Patent Package diminishing the EU’s powers? [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:12 am by Beth Van Schaack
Although the district court got the law right on actus reus, the Ninth Circuit has since muddied the waters. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 1:42 am
| Oprah Winfrey and OWN YOUR POWER trade mark | EPO December Administrative Council Meeting | Blurred Lines | Again on Actavis v Boehringer | Is the EU Patent Package diminishing the EU’s powers? [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
One justice preferred to decide the case under the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms and the three remaining justices upheld the provision under the Canadian Charter. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:23 am by Doorey
That said, it is safe to say that Johnstone and Seeley represent the arc of human rights development in Canada. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Hobby Lobby), explains how the RFRA formula relates to its prior free exercise doctrine as follows: RFRA was enacted three years after our decision in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]