Search for: "WERE V. GARLAND"
Results 321 - 340
of 718
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2020, 4:54 am
That sounds kind of radical to say felons can have firearms, but I think that’s because what the long-standing prohibitions were, and in fact had been even under federal law until more recently, were that violent felons couldn’t have firearms. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 7:25 am
Sandford, holding that slaves were not citizens (1860 election); Engel v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:59 am
In Duren v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 6:17 am
Sims to Bush v. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 2:49 pm
On the fortieth anniversary of the Roe v. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 9:12 am
And actually the case at that time was called Lynch v. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 4:01 am
In California v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 7:24 am
Hyatt ; Janus v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 7:21 am
In a recent Congressional Research Service report, the CRS cites the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm
Although President Barack Obama nominated Judge Merrick Garland in March 2016 to take Scalia’s place, Garland’s nomination went nowhere, and Neil Gorsuch, a judge on the U.S. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Balkin suggests that the Founding Fathers were aware of these future threats and wrote a Constitution to “limit the cycle of constitutional rot” (47). [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
” The Senate, of course, was to be selected by state legislatures, and the president by electors who, we were solemnly promised in Federalist 68, would protect us against demagogues by using their discretion to select only truly trustworthy leaders. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 11:54 am
Indeed, Judge Garland would have had a stronger case than the attorneys general Gov. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm
Gorsuch got his seat after Republicans stonewalled the nomination of Judge Merrick Garland and then Trump unexpectedly prevailed in the 2016 election. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 3:36 am
The holding of Bostock v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
FEC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:16 am
Vance, Trump v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 8:04 am
On March 4, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in June Medical Services v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am
But, as Vice’s Motherboard prepared to publish a story on the documents, Special Services Group stepped out of the shadows to issue sweeping legal threats, arguing that by publishing the documents, researchers were violating everything from federal copyright law to arms control regulations. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am
But, as Vice’s Motherboard prepared to publish a story on the documents, Special Services Group stepped out of the shadows to issue sweeping legal threats, arguing that by publishing the documents, researchers were violating everything from federal copyright law to arms control regulations. [read post]
