Search for: "Watkins v. Watkins" Results 321 - 340 of 823
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2016, 1:10 pm by Eric S. Solotoff
See Moriarty, supra, 177 N.J. at 113 (noting that a best interests test can be satisfied although the child suffers no harm) (citing Watkins v. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 7:00 am by Zachary Burdette
David Ryan previewed the oral argument in Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 1:01 am
Ibrahim, William & Mary Law School, on Wednesday, November 2, 2016 Tags: Capital formation, Crowdfunding, Investor protection, IPOs, JOBS Act, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation,Small firms, Tech companies ISS Proposes New 2017 Voting Policies Posted by Lyuba Goltser, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, on Wednesday, November 2, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, Charter & bylaws, Dual-class stock, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, IPOs,ISS, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting,… [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 6:02 pm by Ad Law Defense
  In McCormick’s case, it sought dismissal of Watkin’s complaint on the theory (among others) that a container’s size is not “commercial advertising and promotion” because no words are involved”, citing Farah v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 6:48 am
This post examines an opinion from the Appellate Court of Illinois – Fifth Division: People v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:57 am by Betty Lupinacci
Professor Watkin managed to concisely detail the legal history of Wales up to modern times. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Soon, Bill set about undermining Bowers with his brilliant opinion in the Perry Watkins case. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 6:27 am
Loseman, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Saturday, July 30, 2016 Tags: Class actions, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fraud-on-the-Market, Halliburton, Merger litigation,Omnicare v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:48 am by Carl Neff
In the recent opinion by Vice Chancellor Glasscock, The Williams Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 5:00 am by John Jascob
The Delaware Chancery Court took a skeptical view as a result, but observed that "motive to avoid a deal does not demonstrate lack of a contractual right to do so" (The Williams Companies, Inc. v. [read post]