Search for: "Wells v. State Bar" Results 321 - 340 of 14,075
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
”  South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
” In reality, Rule 1.8.5(a) does state the general bar on such payments. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 2:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Employment Liability Claims It is well settled that Section 533 bars indemnification of an insured’s direct liability Section 12940(h) of California’s Government Code, which prohibits employers from retaliating against employees for engaging in protected activity under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”). [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:06 am by Rob Robinson
That same year, in Caratube v Kazakhstan, confidential information was leaked from the Kazakh government’s IT system and the claimant eventually obtained some of the leaked documents. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:12 pm by Adam White
Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State, and chairman of the American Bar Association’s Administrative Law Section. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 7:16 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Patent Office issued the following xxx patents to persons and businesses in Indiana in November 2023: PATENT NUMBER PATENT TITLE US 11826689 B2 Air filter arrangement; assembly; and, methods US 11830717 B2 Ion focusing US 11826832 B2 Passivation and alloying element retention in gas atomized powders US 11830716 B2 Mass spectrometry analysis of microorganisms in samples US 11828908 B2 Rack-mountable equipment with a high-heat-dissipation module, and transceiver receptacle with increased cooling US… [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 3:32 am by Peter J. Sluka
 In post-1997 companies, the BCL expressly states that a shareholder does not have preemptive rights unless they are provided for in the corporation’s certificate of incorporation. [read post]